Sermorelin is unusual among research-market peptides in having been a fully approved drug with published, controlled trial data - and then having been withdrawn. It was approved as Geref, studied in hundreds of growth-hormone-deficient children, and discontinued in 2008 for commercial rather than safety reasons. That history means real numbers exist: a dose that produced measured growth, a measured half-life, and a head-to-head comparison against growth hormone itself. This guide is built from those trials rather than from vendor copy, including the findings that are less flattering than the marketing - growth hormone clearly outperformed it, doubling the dose changed nothing, and nearly every patient developed antibodies to it. It also covers the GHRH mechanism, how the trial dose compares with commonly reported figures, and how to read a certificate of analysis. Educational reference material only, not medical advice.
Standard Access: This compound's three paid filesAll-Access Lifetime: all 55 guides + every printableEducational content only
Foundational Guide: Available Now
Educational use only — not medical advice. This guide summarizes information reported in published research and community practice for educational purposes. It is not medical advice and not a recommendation to use any compound. Any doses, schedules, or combinations shown are examples of what has been reported, not instructions for you. Many peptides described here are research compounds that are not FDA-approved for the uses discussed and may be investigational or restricted. Effects, risks, and legal status vary; individual needs and results vary. Consult a qualified, licensed healthcare professional before making any decision. Do not use this content to diagnose, treat, or dose yourself.
Sermorelin at a glance
What it is
Sermorelin acetate, the synthetic 29-amino-acid N-terminal fragment of human growth-hormone-releasing hormone - written GHRH(1-29)NH2. Research in the early 1980s established that the first 29 residues retain full activity at the receptor, making this the shortest fully functional GHRH fragment.
Regulatory history
FDA-approved twice, both times as Geref (sermorelin acetate): under NDA 19-863 in 1990 for diagnostic use, and under NDA 20-443 in 1997 for paediatric growth hormone deficiency. The manufacturer discontinued both in 2008, and in 2013 FDA determined they were not withdrawn for reasons of safety or effectiveness.
Mechanism
A GHRH-receptor agonist on anterior-pituitary somatotrophs, prompting release of the body's own growth hormone. Because it acts upstream of GH itself, normal somatostatin negative feedback stays intact - a genuine mechanistic distinction from administering growth hormone directly.
The dose with data behind it
30 micrograms per kilogram per day, subcutaneously at bedtime, in growth-hormone-deficient children. That is the regimen from the published multicentre trial, and it is the only sermorelin dose with controlled efficacy data attached to it.
What that trial found
In 110 previously untreated prepubertal GH-deficient children, height velocity rose from 4.1 +/- 0.9 cm/yr at baseline to 8.0 +/- 1.5 at six months and 7.2 +/- 1.3 at twelve. 74% were classed as good responders at six months.
The comparison nobody quotes
In a three-arm trial of 60 children, six-month height velocities were 9.2 cm/yr on GHRH(1-29) at 30 mcg/kg/day, 9.3 on 60 mcg/kg/day, and 14.6 on growth hormone at 0.1 IU/kg/day. Growth hormone was significantly superior (p < 0.01), and doubling the GHRH dose achieved nothing.
The immunogenicity finding
In that same trial, nearly all participants in both GHRH groups developed antibodies to GHRH. This is rarely mentioned on commercial pages and is a real characteristic of sustained administration.
Half-life
Very short and properly measured: an initial phase of about 1.9 +/- 0.2 minutes and an elimination phase of about 10.4 +/- 0.2 minutes for GHRH(1-29)NH2. Native GHRH is around 4.3 minutes. Minutes, not hours.
Research-market status
No approved sermorelin product is currently marketed in the United States for the uses discussed here. Material sold as a lyophilised research vial is not an approved medicine and is supplied for research and educational use only.
Educational reference. This page does not publish dose ranges or reconstitution arithmetic.
What it is / mechanism
Sermorelin is the first 29 amino acids of human growth-hormone-releasing hormone, amidated at the C-terminus - GHRH(1-29)NH2. Native GHRH is 44 residues long, and work in the early 1980s established that biological activity at the receptor lives entirely in the first 29. Everything beyond residue 29 can be removed without losing potency, which is what makes sermorelin the shortest fully functional fragment of the parent hormone rather than a partial agonist or an analogue with altered pharmacology.
It binds the GHRH receptor on somatotroph cells of the anterior pituitary, the same receptor the body's own GHRH uses, and triggers the synthesis and pulsatile release of endogenous growth hormone. The mechanistic argument made for this class - and it is a real argument, not marketing - is that acting upstream preserves the regulatory architecture. Growth hormone release remains subject to somatostatin's inhibitory tone and to the negative feedback that IGF-1 exerts, so the pituitary can still refuse. Administering recombinant growth hormone bypasses all of that and delivers a fixed amount regardless of what the feedback loops would have preferred.
That preserved feedback is the mechanistic selling point and it is also, in practice, the ceiling. A drug that asks the pituitary to release growth hormone cannot exceed what the pituitary is able and willing to release. When the head-to-head trial described in the evidence section put GHRH(1-29) against growth hormone itself, growth hormone won decisively - and the mechanism predicts exactly that, because one arm was constrained by the patient's own regulatory system and the other was not. The same feature that makes the approach physiologically elegant limits how much it can do.
The pituitary also has to be capable of responding, which defines who the compound can work for. Sermorelin's approved paediatric indication was growth hormone deficiency of hypothalamic origin - children whose pituitary was intact but whose hypothalamic GHRH signal was inadequate. In someone whose pituitary somatotrophs are themselves damaged or absent, a GHRH agonist has nothing to act on. This is also why the compound found an early role as a diagnostic agent: a GHRH challenge distinguishes hypothalamic from pituitary causes of deficiency by testing whether the pituitary can respond when properly asked.
Sermorelin's pharmacology is dominated by how quickly it disappears. The measured elimination half-life is around ten minutes, with an initial distribution phase closer to two. That is a genuinely short exposure - the molecule is present as a signal, not as a sustained drug level - and it is the reason the trial regimen was a single daily subcutaneous injection given at bedtime rather than a continuous or divided schedule. Bedtime administration aligns the pulse the drug provokes with the body's own largest natural GH pulse, which occurs during early slow-wave sleep. The compound is not maintaining a level; it is adding an impulse to a rhythm that already exists.
Within the GHRH family, sermorelin is the unmodified parent fragment. Tesamorelin adds a trans-3-hexenoyl group at the N-terminus to slow degradation, and CJC-1295 in its no-DAC form - also called Mod GRF 1-29 - carries four amino-acid substitutions for the same purpose. All three act at the same receptor, which is why combining them with each other is redundant, while pairing any of them with a ghrelin-receptor agonist such as ipamorelin is not.
Researched effects
Sermorelin's effect profile is better documented than almost anything else in this market, because it was studied in controlled trials for an approved indication. The honest summary is that it works, and that it worked less well than the alternative.
The pivotal evidence comes from a multicentre trial in 110 previously untreated prepubertal children with growth hormone deficiency, 86 of whom were evaluable for efficacy, given 30 micrograms per kilogram per day subcutaneously at bedtime for up to a year. Height velocity rose from a baseline of 4.1 +/- 0.9 cm per year to 8.0 +/- 1.5 at six months, settling to 7.2 +/- 1.3 at twelve months. At six months, 74% of the children were classed as good responders. Bone age advanced proportionately rather than prematurely - the ratio of change in bone age to change in height age was 1.04 +/- 0.58, not significantly different from unity (p = 0.63), which matters because a growth treatment that accelerates skeletal maturation faster than height gain can reduce final adult stature. There were no adverse biochemical or hormonal changes, no excessive IGF-1 generation and no disturbance of fasting glucose.
That is a real, positive, controlled result: roughly a doubling of growth rate in the first six months, with a favourable bone-age profile and clean biochemistry.
The comparison that puts it in perspective is a separate three-arm trial of 60 children, and it is the study commercial pages do not cite. Twenty children received GHRH(1-29) at 30 mcg/kg/day, twenty received 60 mcg/kg/day, and twenty received growth hormone at 0.1 IU/kg/day. At six months, mean height velocities were 9.2, 9.3 and 14.6 cm per year respectively. Growth hormone was significantly superior to either GHRH dose (p < 0.01). The authors concluded that GHRH was unlikely to be as effective as growth hormone for promoting growth in this population.
Two details inside that result matter more than the headline. First, doubling the dose from 30 to 60 mcg/kg/day produced essentially no additional growth - 9.2 against 9.3 cm/yr. The dose-response curve for this compound was flat across a two-fold range, which is direct evidence for a ceiling imposed by pituitary capacity rather than by how much drug is given. Second, nearly all participants in both GHRH groups developed antibodies to GHRH. IGF-1 rose initially during GHRH treatment and then declined back toward baseline over the study, a pattern consistent with a response that attenuates rather than sustains. Adverse effects were minimal - three patients reported mild injection-site irritation.
The attenuation and antibody findings are the single most useful things to know about sustained sermorelin administration, and they are almost entirely absent from commercial material about the compound.
Every figure above was generated in growth-hormone-deficient children being measured for linear growth, which is a different population and a different endpoint from the adult use the research market is interested in. That does not mean the adult record is empty, and this page used to say it was. Two placebo-controlled University of Washington trials gave the same molecule to healthy older adults at 14 mcg/kg (about 1 mg) in a single evening injection - NCT00000380 on age-related sleep impairment, and a six-month trial in 89 adults that reported improved WAIS-R performance IQ and several other cognitive measures against placebo (PMID 16399214). The investigators' own review describes both as covering GH profiles, body composition and functional status including sleep, cognition and physical function. So sleep, body composition and cognition in adults have been tested against placebo; what has not been tested is whether any of that translates into the recovery and anti-ageing outcomes the market talks about, and none of the paediatric numbers above describes an adult.
Nothing here is a claim that sermorelin treats, prevents or improves any condition, and nothing here is medical advice.
Evidence & regulatory status
Pivotal paediatric trial (PMID 8772599): a multicentre study of once-daily subcutaneous GHRH(1-29) at 30 micrograms/kg/day given at bedtime in 110 previously untreated prepubertal growth-hormone-deficient children, 86 evaluable for efficacy, for up to one year. Height velocity 4.1 +/- 0.9 cm/yr at baseline, 8.0 +/- 1.5 at six months, 7.2 +/- 1.3 at twelve months; 74% classed as good responders at six months; bone age to height age ratio 1.04 +/- 0.58, not significantly different from unity (p = 0.63); no adverse biochemical or hormonal changes, no excessive IGF-1 generation, no fasting glucose alteration.
Head-to-head comparison against growth hormone (PMID 8329830): 60 children in three groups of twenty - GHRH(1-29)-NH2 at 30 mcg/kg/day, GHRH(1-29)-NH2 at 60 mcg/kg/day, and growth hormone at 0.1 IU/kg/day - over six months. Mean height velocities 9.2, 9.3 and 14.6 cm/yr respectively; growth hormone significantly superior to either GHRH arm (p < 0.01); no significant difference between the two GHRH doses; IGF-1 rose initially then declined toward baseline; nearly all participants in both GHRH groups developed antibodies to GHRH; three patients reported mild injection-site irritation. The authors concluded GHRH was unlikely to be as effective as GH for promoting growth in GH deficiency.
Additional paediatric studies: PMID 8329826, growth response to GHRH(1-29)NH2 compared with growth hormone in 43 prepubertal children aged 4.3 to 18.9 years (mean 10.4); PMID 8329828, a six-month pilot of intranasal GHRH(1-29)NH2 in eight prepubertal children with GH deficiency, examining growth-promoting potential and maximal plasma concentrations.
Pharmacokinetics (PMID 2866222): for the GHRH analogue hGRF(1-29)NH2, an initial-phase half-life of 1.9 +/- 0.2 minutes and an elimination-phase half-life of 10.4 +/- 0.2 minutes. For context, PMID 7962295 reports native GHRH at 4.3 +/- 1.4 minutes and a D-Ala2-substituted analogue at 6.7 +/- 0.5 minutes, illustrating how single-residue modifications were used specifically to extend it. PMID 14499707 describes GRF analogues generally as having a short plasma half-life of about 10 to 20 minutes in humans.
Regulatory record: FDA approved Geref (sermorelin acetate) under NDA 19-863 in 1990 for diagnostic use, and under NDA 20-443 in 1997 for paediatric growth hormone deficiency. The manufacturer, EMD Serono, discontinued both products in 2008. In a Federal Register determination of 4 March 2013 (document 2013-04827), FDA found they were not withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness; the notice gives no other reason. The distinction matters: a drug FDA has cleared of a safety withdrawal carries a different evidentiary status from one withdrawn for harm.
Mechanistic basis: work in the early 1980s established that the first 29 amino acids of the 44-residue native GHRH retain full biological activity at the receptor, which is why sermorelin is the shortest fully functional GHRH fragment and why longer constructs offer no additional receptor activity.
This page previously stated that no controlled trial of sermorelin had been run on the adult outcomes the research market cares about. That was wrong, and it is withdrawn here rather than quietly deleted. Two placebo-controlled trials in healthy older adults did test this exact molecule at the University of Washington: NCT00000380 gave GHRH or placebo to 40 older men and 40 older women on oestrogen replacement for age-related sleep impairment, and a six-month trial in 89 healthy older adults (mean age 68) reported improved WAIS-R performance IQ, picture arrangement, finding A's and verbal sets against placebo (PMID 16399214). Both used a single evening subcutaneous injection of 14 micrograms per kilogram, roughly 1 mg, and the investigators' own review confirms the compound: it thanks Serono Laboratories for supplying "GHRH (sermorelin acetate, Geref)" and placebo. That acknowledgement is the only place the trials are tied to the name, which is why no search on "sermorelin" surfaces them and why commercial pages - this one included - kept repeating that the adult record was empty.
What remains true is narrower and still worth stating: the paediatric figures quoted above - the height velocities, the response rates, the dose comparison - were generated in growth-hormone-deficient children measured for linear growth, and none of them describes what this compound does in a healthy adult. The adult trials above measured sleep, cognition, body composition and physical function, not those numbers.
Research timeline
Dated milestones taken from the primary records: the molecule's discovery, its first registered human study, the trials that shaped the evidence and the regulatory decisions. Each entry links to the record it comes from.
Roger Guillemin's group isolates a 44-amino-acid growth-hormone-releasing factor from a human pancreatic tumour that had caused acromegaly; a synthetic copy is fully active. Sermorelin is the hormone's shortened 1–29 fragment. PMID 6812220
FDA approves Geref (sermorelin acetate, Serono) as a diagnostic agent, to evaluate the pituitary gland's ability to secrete growth hormone. Federal Register 2013-04827
An open-label, one-year international study in 110 previously untreated children with growth hormone deficiency reports height velocity rising from 4.1 cm a year to 8.0 at six months and 7.2 at twelve, with no change in fasting glucose. PMID 8772599
FDA approves a second Geref product for treatment: idiopathic growth hormone deficiency in children with growth failure. Federal Register 2013-04827
After EMD Serono discontinued both Geref products in 2008 and asked for the applications to be withdrawn, FDA's withdrawal of both approvals takes effect. Federal Register 2013-04827
FDA determines that Geref was not withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness, which leaves the way open for generic applications that refer to it. Federal Register 2013-04827
Records checked Oct 3, 2026
Claims at a glance
The claims most often made about this compound, each with the strongest kind of evidence we found for it. The grade says what was studied, not whether the claim is true; the line beside it says what that study showed.
Raises growth hormone and IGF-1Human, randomised trial. In a placebo-controlled programme in older adults, the investigators report that men's growth hormone output roughly doubled and IGF-1 rose about 40%; women on oral oestrogen responded least. PMID 22034239
Burns fat and builds lean muscleHuman, randomised trial. The same investigators report body fat down about 5%, with a matching gain in lean mass, as preliminary results; a separate six-week study in 11 older men found no change in muscle or fat. PMID 22034239
Increases strength and fitnessHuman, randomised trial. Reviewing their placebo-controlled programme, the investigators state there was no improvement in strength or aerobic fitness. PMID 18488883
Sharpens memory and thinking in older adultsHuman, randomised trial. Over six months against placebo in 89 healthy older adults, scores improved on five of the cognitive tests reported, regardless of sex or starting ability. PMID 16399214
Improves sleepHuman, randomised trial. Preliminary data from the placebo-controlled programme showed self-rated sleep slightly worse, not better; objective sleep results were not yet available in that report. PMID 22034239
Speeds growth in children short of growth hormoneHuman, non-randomised. In an open one-year study of 110 previously untreated children, growth rose from 4.1 cm a year to 8.0 at six months and 7.2 at twelve; there was no placebo group. PMID 8772599
The reasoning behind each grade, study by study, is in this guide's Benefit & Outcome Review.
Grades checked Oct 7, 2026
A printable reference sheet with the compound's key facts, storage guidance and a vial record comes with All-Access Lifetime.
Half-life & pharmacokinetics
Sermorelin's half-life is short, and unlike most peptides in this market it has actually been measured. Published pharmacokinetics for GHRH(1-29)NH2 report a two-phase profile: an initial phase of about 1.9 +/- 0.2 minutes and an elimination phase of about 10.4 +/- 0.2 minutes. For context, native 44-residue GHRH is reported at around 4.3 +/- 1.4 minutes, and GRF analogues as a class are described as having plasma half-lives of roughly 10 to 20 minutes in humans.
These are minutes, not hours, and that single fact explains most of how the compound is used. Sermorelin is not maintaining a plasma level; it delivers a brief signal to the pituitary and is gone. The growth hormone pulse it provokes outlasts the peptide that caused it, which is why a once-daily injection of something with a ten-minute half-life is a coherent regimen rather than an obvious mismatch.
It also explains why the entire GHRH analogue class was engineered the way it was. The published record shows researchers making single-residue substitutions specifically to extend this number - a D-Ala2 substitution raises it from about 4.3 to about 6.7 minutes, and later work on PEGylation and albumin conjugation pursued the same goal more aggressively. Tesamorelin's N-terminal hexenoyl group and CJC-1295's four substitutions are commercial expressions of the same engineering problem. Sermorelin is the unmodified baseline that all of those were trying to improve on, which means its short duration is not a flaw in a particular product but the native property of the parent molecule.
The practical consequence is that timing dominates. With a ten-minute elimination phase, when the injection is given matters far more than it would for a compound lasting hours, and the bedtime convention - aligning the provoked pulse with the natural nocturnal one - is the trial protocol rather than folklore.
Reported side effects & toxicology
Sermorelin has a better-characterised safety record than most compounds discussed in research settings, because it went through controlled paediatric trials for an approved indication and was monitored biochemically.
In the 110-child pivotal trial, the compound was described as well tolerated overall, with no adverse biochemical or hormonal changes, no excessive IGF-1 generation and no alteration in fasting glucose. In the three-arm comparison, adverse effects were minimal and confined to three patients reporting mild injection-site irritation. Injection-site reactions - redness, itching or transient discomfort - are the most commonly reported effect in both trial and community settings, along with occasional flushing or headache. Because the compound provokes a growth hormone pulse rather than supplying growth hormone directly, the fluid retention, joint discomfort and insulin-sensitivity effects associated with exogenous growth hormone are reported less often; the intact feedback loop is the mechanistic reason usually given, and the clean biochemistry in the paediatric trial is consistent with it.
The finding that deserves more attention than it gets is immunogenicity. In the head-to-head trial, nearly all participants in both GHRH dose groups developed antibodies to GHRH over six months of daily administration. The trial did not report this as a harm, and it was not accompanied by adverse clinical events - but alongside the observation that IGF-1 rose and then declined back toward baseline, it describes a biological response to sustained administration. It is not a safety alarm; it is a fact about what the body does when given this molecule daily for months, and it is absent from essentially all commercial material.
The compound's own regulatory history is worth reading correctly in this context. Geref was discontinued by its manufacturer in 2008, and FDA determined in 2013 that it was not withdrawn for reasons of safety or effectiveness. A drug that leaves the market for reasons other than harm carries a different evidentiary status from one withdrawn for harm, and conflating the two in either direction misrepresents the record.
No approved sermorelin product is currently marketed in the United States for these uses. Material sold as a research chemical is not manufactured to pharmaceutical standards, is not an approved medicine, and is not intended for administration to people.
Storage & handling
Lyophilised and unopened: store cold; the dry powder is the stable form and tolerates shipping without refrigeration for short periods.
Reconstituted: refrigerate at roughly 2-8 degrees Celsius and protect from light. Commonly cited usable windows of a few weeks are handling conventions rather than stability data measured for this peptide.
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles, and direct the bacteriostatic water down the vial wall rather than shaking - GHRH fragments are handled as fragile peptides.
Wipe the vial stopper with alcohol before each entry; the benzyl alcohol in bacteriostatic water inhibits bacterial growth but does not replace aseptic technique.
References
Primary sources for this page: the published paediatric trial literature, principally PMID 8772599 (the 110-child multicentre study of 30 mcg/kg/day at bedtime), PMID 8329830 (the three-arm comparison against growth hormone, source of the 9.2 / 9.3 / 14.6 cm/yr figures and the antibody finding), PMID 8329826 and PMID 8329828; pharmacokinetic reports PMID 2866222, PMID 7962295 and PMID 14499707 for the half-life figures; the two placebo-controlled adult trials at the University of Washington, NCT00000380 (age-related sleep impairment) and PMID 16399214 (six-month cognition trial in 89 healthy older adults), together with the investigators' review PMC3181657, which is where the 14 mcg/kg (~1 mg) evening dose is stated and where the trial drug is identified as sermorelin acetate (Geref), supplied by Serono Laboratories; and the FDA regulatory record for Geref (NDA 19-863, 1990, and NDA 20-443, 1997), including FDA's Federal Register determination of 4 March 2013 (2013-04827) that both products, discontinued in 2008, were not withdrawn for reasons of safety or effectiveness. Research-market dosage ranges are described as reported practice and are not drawn from any trial. Nothing on this page is medical advice, and no approved sermorelin product is currently marketed in the United States for the uses discussed.
Evidence File
The Sermorelin Evidence File: Two Corrected Numbers and an Empty Registry
Sermorelin is one of the very few compounds in this market with genuine controlled trial data behind it, which makes the quality of the secondary reporting around it unusually important. This module goes back to the primary records: the fetched abstracts of every paediatric trial the free guide cites, the two pharmacokinetic papers behind the half-life figures that travel with this compound everywhere, and a full ClinicalTrials.gov sweep run on 2026-08-26 with each query named so it can be rerun. Two of the most widely repeated pharmacokinetic attributions turn out to belong to a different species and a different molecule. The registry result is not what the search page appears to show, and the compound's own name reaches only a fraction of its own literature.
2 pharmacokinetic figures re-attributed to their real source
4.3 minutes: the human half-life, measured in 10 normal men
39 of 40 children developed anti-GHRH antibodies in six months
No registered therapeutic sermorelin trial, of any status
The half-life everyone quotes was measured in anaesthetized rats
The pivotal trial was open label, and 24 of 110 never reached the efficacy analysis
A second randomized trial, dosed three times a day, and it disagrees
The antibody finding, with the counts and the follow-up nobody reports
The intranasal trial did not merely underperform - it failed, and said so
The registry looks like a sermorelin pipeline, and holds no sermorelin trial
Searching the compound's own name finds about seven percent of its literature
7 more sections in the Evidence File for Sermorelin
Unlock the Evidence File, Sourcing File and Benefit & Outcome Review for Sermorelin for $14 — or every compound in the library, plus the printable reference sheets, for $99.
The sections above this one stay free to read without an account.
Sourcing File
The Sermorelin Sourcing File: The Substitution No Certificate Can See
Most certificate-of-analysis guidance is generic, because most peptides fail in generic ways. Sermorelin does not. Its nearest research-market neighbour is a stereoisomer that shares its molecular formula and its monoisotopic mass to every decimal place, which means the two lines a buyer normally trusts most on a certificate cannot separate them. This module builds the compound-specific numbers a certificate has to be read against: the identity block re-derived from the sequence rather than copied, the electrospray ion series, the acetate and moisture arithmetic worked against a labelled vial, the degradation peaks this particular sequence produces, and a line-by-line read of a constructed certificate.
0 daltons separate sermorelin from its D-Ala2 stereoisomer
2023: the first published separation of the two
1.8 to 6.7 percent of a salt-form label is counter-ion
3 deamidation sites and 1 oxidation site in 29 residues
The identity block, re-derived rather than copied
The ion series a certificate may print, and two traps inside it
The D-Ala2 stereoisomer: the same atoms, the other hand
Ten daltons to Mod GRF 1-29, and the sulfur atom that settles it
Acetate, water, and what a labelled 5 mg vial actually delivers
The degradation peaks this sequence produces, and one law-enforcement record
Reading a certificate line by line, with the expected values attached
7 more sections in the Sourcing File for Sermorelin
Unlock the Evidence File, Sourcing File and Benefit & Outcome Review for Sermorelin for $14 — or every compound in the library, plus the printable reference sheets, for $99.
The sections above this one stay free to read without an account.
Benefit & Outcome Review
The Sermorelin Benefit and Outcome Review: Every Adult Claim, Traced to Its Document
The free guide establishes that sermorelin's efficacy data come from growth-hormone-deficient children measured for linear growth. This module asks the question that leaves open: what adult data exist, and where do the circulating adult numbers actually come from? The adult record turns out to be larger than any search on the compound's own name can show - part of it is placebo-controlled, ran for months, and is filed under a name that does not include this compound at all. Each circulating claim is then followed back to the document it originates in, and those documents are described by study type, species, molecule and what was actually measured. Several turn out to be about something other than sermorelin. One contains no data at all, one contains an experiment its own abstract never mentions, and one review hands this molecule another molecule's trial.
2 placebo-controlled adult trials, invisible to any search on the compound name
2 mg nightly for 6 weeks: DEXA found no change in muscle or fat
3 secretagogues at once, on testosterone, in the 14-man chart review
1 editorial with no methods and no patients underpins the adult case
The two ageing studies a name search cannot reach
The placebo-controlled adult trials that no search on this compound returns
The chart review the marketing actually cites
Where the body-fat percentage comes from, and which molecule earned it
The 2006 editorial that made adult sermorelin thinkable
The no-tachyphylaxis claim, against the human record
The review sentence behind the body-composition claim, and the molecule inside it
A glioma paper whose abstract hides its own experiment
Non-responders, and the shape of the response over months
Trial protocol against reported practice, and the claims that survive
10 more sections in the Benefit & Outcome Review for Sermorelin
Unlock the Evidence File, Sourcing File and Benefit & Outcome Review for Sermorelin for $14 — or every compound in the library, plus the printable reference sheets, for $99.
Quick answers about guide scope, access, and educational use context.
What is the sermorelin dosage that has trial data behind it?
30 micrograms per kilogram per day, given subcutaneously at bedtime. That is the regimen from the published multicentre trial in 110 growth-hormone-deficient children, where height velocity rose from 4.1 cm/yr at baseline to 8.0 cm/yr at six months, with 74% classed as good responders. It is the only sermorelin dose with controlled efficacy data attached. The figures commonly reported on the research market are considerably smaller and have no published dose-finding study behind them. Nothing here is a recommendation - the trial dose was established in children with a diagnosed deficiency, measured for linear growth.
Does a higher sermorelin dose produce more effect?
The one published test of this found it did not. In a three-arm trial, six-month height velocity was 9.2 cm/yr on 30 mcg/kg/day and 9.3 cm/yr on 60 mcg/kg/day - doubling the dose changed nothing measurable. This makes mechanistic sense: a GHRH agonist asks the pituitary to release its own growth hormone, so pituitary capacity rather than the size of the request sets the ceiling. It is unusual to have a published null result on dose escalation for a compound in this market, and it is worth weighing against the assumption that more is more.
How does sermorelin compare with growth hormone?
Directly, in one trial, and growth hormone won. Sixty children were randomised to GHRH(1-29) at 30 mcg/kg/day, GHRH(1-29) at 60 mcg/kg/day, or growth hormone at 0.1 IU/kg/day. Six-month height velocities were 9.2, 9.3 and 14.6 cm per year, with growth hormone significantly superior (p < 0.01), and the authors concluded GHRH was unlikely to be as effective as GH for promoting growth. The mechanism predicts this: growth hormone is administered directly, while a GHRH agonist remains subject to the patient's own somatostatin feedback. The trade-off - preserved feedback regulation against a lower ceiling - is the honest way to frame the comparison.
What is the half-life of sermorelin?
Very short and properly measured: an initial phase of about 1.9 minutes and an elimination phase of about 10.4 minutes for GHRH(1-29)NH2. Native 44-residue GHRH is around 4.3 minutes, and GRF analogues generally are described as 10 to 20 minutes in humans. These are minutes, not hours. The compound delivers a brief signal to the pituitary rather than maintaining a plasma level, and the growth hormone pulse it provokes outlasts the peptide itself - which is why a once-daily injection is coherent despite the rapid clearance.
Why is sermorelin taken at bedtime?
Because the body's largest natural growth hormone pulse occurs during early slow-wave sleep, and a compound cleared in about ten minutes is best placed to amplify a pulse that is about to happen anyway. This is not community folklore - the pivotal paediatric trial dosed at bedtime, so the convention matches the protocol that produced the growth data. With a half-life this short, timing is not a refinement but the greater part of the strategy.
Is sermorelin FDA-approved?
It was, twice, and is no longer marketed. Geref (sermorelin acetate) was approved under NDA 19-863 in 1990 for diagnostic use, and under NDA 20-443 in 1997 for paediatric growth hormone deficiency. The manufacturer discontinued both in 2008, and in 2013 FDA determined in the Federal Register that they were not withdrawn for reasons of safety or effectiveness; the notice gives no other reason. That distinction matters when reading the record: a withdrawal that was not for safety or effectiveness leaves the trial evidence intact in a way a safety withdrawal does not. No approved sermorelin product is currently marketed in the United States for the uses discussed here.
Do people develop antibodies to sermorelin?
In the published trial, nearly all of them did. In the three-arm comparison, nearly all participants in both GHRH dose groups developed antibodies to GHRH over six months of daily administration, and IGF-1 rose initially before declining back toward baseline. The trial did not report clinical harm from this, but it is a documented biological response to sustained daily administration and it is essentially absent from commercial pages about the compound. Anyone considering extended continuous use should know the trial record describes a response that attenuates rather than one that simply persists.
Does sermorelin work for adults?
Yes, and this page said otherwise until 28 August 2026. Two placebo-controlled University of Washington trials gave this molecule to healthy older adults: NCT00000380 in 40 older men and 40 older women on oestrogen replacement, for age-related sleep impairment; and a six-month trial in 89 healthy older adults (mean age 68) that reported improved WAIS-R performance IQ, picture arrangement, finding A's and verbal sets against placebo (PMID 16399214). The dose in both was a single evening subcutaneous injection of 14 micrograms per kilogram, about 1 mg. They are invisible to a search on the compound's name because the papers call it GHRH(1-29)NH2; the link is in the investigators' own review, which thanks Serono Laboratories for supplying "GHRH (sermorelin acetate, Geref)" and placebo. What is still true is that the height velocities and response rates quoted on this page came from growth-hormone-deficient children measured for linear growth, so those particular numbers do not describe a healthy adult.
Compliance and trust notes
Educational content only; no personalized health or outcome claims.
No personalized use recommendation outputs.
Use this material for general learning and research-context literacy.
A certificate of analysis (COA) is a laboratory’s report on one sample of one batch. The single most useful thing to know about it is that purity and identity are two separate results that fail in different ways. A high purity figure says the sample was mostly one substance; it does not say that substance was Sermorelin. Identity — normally a mass-spectrometry result matching the expected molecular weight — is what establishes what the material actually is, and a certificate reporting purity alone has not answered that question.
Two further limits are worth holding onto. Mass per vial is its own test: a vial can be 99% pure and still contain less material than the label claims. And sterility, endotoxin, heavy metals and residual solvent screening are separately commissioned tests, usually priced individually — so a “third-party tested” badge asserts none of them unless the certificate names them. Check that the batch or lot number on the document matches the vial in front of you; an unmatched certificate describes someone else’s material.
Medibact does not test, endorse or resell peptides, and publishes no rating of any laboratory. How to read a peptide certificate of analysis walks through the document section by section, and what each COA field establishes covers the field-by-field detail and the laboratories that publish their methods.
You’ll need bacteriostatic water
The diluent for reconstituting Sermorelin
Reconstitution is volume arithmetic — it assumes a lyophilized vial is dissolved in bacteriostatic water, which is sterile water preserved with 0.9% benzyl alcohol. The preservative is what allows a vial to be entered more than once; plain sterile water carries none and is single-entry by design. Medibact supplies USP-grade Bacteriostatic Water for Injection in a 30 mL multi-dose vial, produced in an FDA-registered U.S. facility and shipped from the United States, for research use only. One 30 mL vial covers 30 reconstitutions at 1 mL each, 15 at 2 mL, or 10 at 3 mL — division only, not a dosing recommendation.
Educational use only — not medical advice. This guide summarizes information reported in published research and community practice for educational purposes. It is not medical advice and not a recommendation to use any compound. Any doses, schedules, or combinations shown are examples of what has been reported, not instructions for you. Many peptides described here are research compounds that are not FDA-approved for the uses discussed and may be investigational or restricted. Effects, risks, and legal status vary; individual needs and results vary. Consult a qualified, licensed healthcare professional before making any decision. Do not use this content to diagnose, treat, or dose yourself.